|
SIPs vs. Conventional Framing
To compare the cost of SIPs to stick-frame construction is not an apples-to-apples comparison. Stick construction cannot compete with the thermal efficiency or superior strength of SIPs. Although the initial materials-to-materials cost of SIPs may be slightly higher than 2x construction, you must keep in mind that you are actually paying for some framing labor when you purchase our panels. The cost difference for your finished home will only be 3%-5% more than a stick-framed home, depending on labor and material costs in your area. The 50% or greater energy savings quickly recoups any additional investment over the cost of conventional framing. The savings continue even when you sell your home. A study released by the EPA in 1998 revealed that energy efficiency increases the resale value of homes by $20 for every $1 in annual energy cost savings.
A stirring news is that from 2007, a house built with Quacent SIPS can be the same or less than conventional framing house due to our continious cost reduction and supply chain strategy worldwidly. In view of this, Quacent SIPS house will have greater competence power and seize more market share.
As the cost of crude oil continues to rise, and the availability of fossil fuels continues to decline, the resale value of energy efficient housing will continue to improve.
|
Home